Wartune ranks people with who pays the most, not skills

I have a question to wartune developers..... why does battle rating trump skills in your monthly events such as "class wars" or "clash of the titan?"  Better yet, why does your battle ranking only count for your placement of finals in these events instead of your preliminaries rank? 

Oh, I know why.  It's to reward people who spend copious amounts of money on your stupid game in which you rip them off and scam people; not people with skills.  You don't care nor respect any cashers which is the main reason why I started this blog.  You only listen to people who foolishly spend over $2000 a month.

With this kind of behavior, if you want to be one of the top players in these kind of event, you need to spend thousands of dollars per month because skills don't matter...only your battle rating.  Otherwise, don't even bother spending a dime.  Even if you are a strategic casher; your skills won't mater.  As long as you place in the top 100 preliminaries ranking, your battle rating will trump your rank.  So, if someone with a high battle rating loses more rounds than someone with a lower battle rating, and they both make the finals, the person with the high battle rating will have a better ranking than the player with the lower battle rating. 

Also, the finals is split between two halls.  One for the top 16, and the other for 17-100. 

As you can see, this ranking system is quite unfair to the people who are near rank 16 and are skillfull players.  Even if their preliminary ranking is greater than 16 but they have a lower battle rating, they wouldn't be able to participate in the warlord's hall. 

This is yet another reason to consider before spending money on a game that is "free to play" game... figure out how ranking is determined in competitive events because like wartune, they may rank people by how much money they spend, NOT skills.